|
Contingent Valuation
in Eco-risk Assessment: A Study in Conservation of Stream Biodiversity
The Center for
Sustainable Systems Studies received a boost for its research programs
in September 1999 with the awarding of a three-year grant from the
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. The project, titled Determining
Biodiversity Values in a Place-based Ecological Risk Assessment
will evaluate the benefits from reducing risks to species due to
urbanization (from Columbus) of portions of the Big Darby Creek
watershed in Central Ohio. The watershed is unusually rich in fish
and mussel species and has been the focus of conservation efforts
by local farm groups, The Nature Conservancy, the Ohio Environmental
Protection Agency, and the U.S. Departments of Agriculture and Interior.
The Miami researchers
are being funded by EPAs National Center for Environmental
Assessment to the extent of $277,000. The study goal is to determine
how much the water quality and unique biodiversity of the watershed
are worth to stakeholders, thereby translating risks to these amenities
from agriculture and residential development into dollar values.
Ecological Risk
Assessment (ERA) is a new more fully integrative approach to water
quality protection now being investigated by the US EPA. The Principal
Investigators will be Homer Erekson (economics) and Orie Loucks
(zoology). They will work with Raymond Gorman (finance), Tim Krehbiel
(decision sciences and management information systems) and Steven
Elliott (economics).
The threats
to biological diversity in the stream include erosion, nutrients
and other chemicals from agricultural activity and the runoff from
urban encroachment. Conservation efforts are underway already through
USDA's Natural Resource Conservation Service, TNC, the U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service, the Ohio Environmental Protection Agency,
and other federal, state and private partners.
The project
consists of two interdependent elements, land-use change scenarios
as development proceeds, and contingent valuation surveys of all
stakeholders to determine how land values are perceived to change
as biodiversity is protected or lost. Four scenarios are of interest:
a base case of agriculture (e.g., as maintained through state-authorized
purchase of development rights), conventional subdivision (one-quarter
to 1 acre lots), ranchette development (2-5 acre lots), and high-density
cluster development while protecting most of the farmland. The scenarios
are linked to water quality outcomes and associated effects on the
biological diversity in the stream.
The results
from the contingent valuation surveys are being used to determine
changes in stakeholder willingness to pay for changes in land value
associated with the level of conservation of biodiversity specified
for each development scenario. The results of the study are intended
to assist the US EPA in its obligation to consider cost and benefits
of proposed environmental protection regulations before these become
adopted.
"The purpose
of the surveys is to determine the willingness of different stakeholders
to pay for conservation of biodiversity associated with each development
scenario," Elliott said. An approach using ecological risk
assessment as a framework provides scientific information that zoning
officials and water quality managers need to consider, along with
economic and social factors, in achieving watershed management goals,
Loucks said.
The grant is
the first U.S. EPA award to faculty in the Richard T. Farmer School
of Business and demonstrates the Center's leadership in environmental
research, said Raymond Gorman, Director of the Center at the time
of the award.
See Framing
a Contingent Valuation for the first results of the study,
a PDF file.
|