|
Great Lakes
Focused Investment Strategy
Experience has
shown that good environmental management by publicly traded corporations
is associated positively with average or better total return on
investment. A series of two workshops took place during the summer
and fall of 2001 to explore whether Great Lakes ecosystem function
can be protected or restored by investing in and supporting the
products or services of corporations whose environmental performance
benefits ecosystem function in the Great Lakes basin.
The workshops
examined the proposition that restoring ecosystem function creates
added value in the Great Lakes community through environmental protection.
Illustrative ecosystem functions being considered include reduction
in hydrologic interventions, avoiding losses of productivity of
forests and wetlands, controlling soil erosion and nutrient enrichment,
reducing high risk air emissions or liquid discharges, facilitating
recycling and reuse of resources, conserving energy resources, reducing
risks to biological diversity, and facilitating low impact industrial
and residential development.
The first workshop,
held in late July, used the input of ecosystem scientists to assess
the potential for region-wide benefits in ecosystem function (through
incentives in the capital markets), and examined prospects for agreement
on a protocol for evaluating corporate performance relative to conservation
of ecosystem function.
The second workshop,
in October, engaged corporate and financial analysts, university
faculty in business fields, ecosystem science and Management Consultants
to ask: Can the Capital Markets Support Business Initiatives for
Great Lakes Functional Recovery and Value Creation? Capital markets
here is understood not only as publicly traded stocks, but also
as corporate bonds and commercial loans or mortgages.
Issues considered
in both workshops include definition of function benefits and system
boundaries, the scale of business applications (local to regional
or global), the prospect of calculating integrative ratings of environmental
performance, time sensitivity of applicable investment recommendations,
and the balancing of tradeoffs in an emerging methodology. A full
report is being prepared and will be available in early 2002.
|